Consumer Health Information Needs in the Rural Northwest:
A Value-Sensitive Design Approach (2001 - 2003)

The needs for health information, especially regarding communicable disease, diabetes and cancer, are considered particularly acute among disadvantaged and underserved populations in such rural areas as Central Washington. These factors have led local healthcare providers to identify information flow as a major impediment to improving public awareness of consumer health issues and practices, and to information among service providers.

Supported by the University of Washington’s Royalty Research Fund and the National Network of Libraries of Medicine, Pacific Northwest Region Division, we investigated the perceptions of Yakima Valley residents regarding healthy living, their needs for consumer health information, their information-seeking patterns, and different media.


Spotlights


Consumer health information needs interview instruments

VSD Projects

National Network of Libraries of Medicine


The study was based on value sensitive design (VSD)—a framework proposed by Batya Friedman and colleagues (1997; Forthcoming; Friedman, et. al., 2002; Friedman & Kahn, 2003). VSD is a principled and comprehensive approach to designing technologies and services that centers around human well-being and reflects different core human values. It enables one to identify the values held by different stakeholders regarding a particular phenomenon—such as interpersonal information sources—and then incorporate these values in information technologies and services such that they support human behavior. Standard values derived from past VSD studies conducted by Friedman and colleagues include welfare, quality of life, sociability, freedom of expression, self-actualization and autonomy, trust, and privacy.

Our study was conducted over three stages. First, focus groups were held with 15 local healthcare and information providers about their perceptions of their clients’ health information needs. Second, an initial interview guide was designed and pre-tested with 26 local residents. Based on responses from those data, a second, more condensed interview guide was developed and used to conduct in-person interviews with another 18 residents (grand total of 44). Prior to visiting Yakima Valley, local websites and other resources were examined to gain extensive background about different human services and the community.

While papers from this project are under peer review, in brief and as shown in Table 1, 14 value-related factors appeared to influence participants’ information behavior. While access was the value of greatest importance to consumers, Non-People Resources and Non-People Factors aroused value conflicts: consumers wanted accurate, thorough, comprehensive, and individualized information, but they also wanted it quickly–despite compromising authority. Consumers sought advice and acted upon information from individuals with whom they had relationships without questioning the accuracy or thoroughness of the information. Thus, great opportunity exists with helping consumers seek and use information. As shown in the Value Matrix in Table 2, data were further analyzed by the degree (high, medium, low) to which consumers valued different factors. This value-sensitive approach to understanding information behavior will be explored further in future studies.

Table 1: Consumer Information-related Values
Access Freedom or availability to obtain, to act upon, or to make use of health-related information
Comprehensiveness Perceived breadth of coverage of specific health-related topic
Trust Perceived breadth of coverage of specific health-related topic Confidence in an individual or institution where healthcare customers are able to assess potential risks and harms of the relationship
Cost Perceived sacrifice to seek health-related information
Financial Monetary expenses used in seeking health-related information
Emotional Potential change in or disclosure of psyche while seeking health-related information
Medium of Delivery Value implications that accompany the format in which health-related information is delivered
Understandability Ability to grasp the meaning of or interpret the health-related information received
Authority of Source Belief in the influence or opinions of an individual, book, instrument, organization, or institution
Accuracy Perceived correctness of health-related information or source
Thoroughness Perceived depth or completeness in detail of health-related information
Privacy Consumers' claim, entitlement, or right to determine what information is shared about them
Confidentiality Ability to freely share health-related information without fear of disclosure
Timeliness Appropriate health-related information received at the right time
Individualization Perception that healthcare consumer is catered to for their individual need and receives care and treatment that is customized for their unique situation
Freedom from Bias Perceived freedom from systematic unfairness due to cultural, racial, geographic, etc preconception placed on individuals or groups

 

Table 2: Information-related Value Matrix
  People Resources People Factors Non-People Resources Non-People Factors Self-Sought Information (General) Health Information
Access High High High High High High
Comprehensiveness Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium
Trust High High Medium Medium Medium Medium
Cost - - - - - -
Financial n/a Medium Low Low High High
Emotional High High Low Medium High Low
Medium of Delivery Low High High High High High
Understandability Low Medium High Medium High Medium
Authority of Source Medium High High High Medium Medium
Accuracy Low Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium
Thoroughness Low Medium Low High High Medium
Privacy High High Medium Low High High
Confidentiality High High Low Low High High
Timeliness High Low High High High Low
Individualization High High Low Low Low Low
Freedom from Bias High High Medium Medium High High

 

Home | About IBEC | Projects | Publications | Tools and Resources

       IBEC is a research program of the University of Washington

To contact the IBEC team email us at ibec@u.washington.edu